1. The state of the DAO and the current vision
   1. Discussion regarding too many work streams and conflict of resources currently (education content vs. project/consulting work)
      1. We need some members that are very aligned on handling these workstreams, interest in Education/ educational content: Johannes, partially Christian (through PhD work).
      2. The bigger question is the commitment of the members - then we can focus on the content
2. Discussion of Commitments (in order to build)

multiple days if consulting and synergy with twinu | Consulting (if synergy with twinu, and no competition, then happy to provide input and work) | | Christian Z. | 4-8hrs per week

project work also multiple days | Admin and project funding. | | Eva | 5 hrs per week [flexible capacity to do more for at least a year] | Consulting and innovation work | | Johannes | 30 hrs [next 2 to 3 months] | Consulting and education projects (happy to publish the learnings out of the projects) | | Korbinian | 8-10 hrs per week [1 month at least, semi flexible] | Tech, but also willing to do other things (with lead from others) ++Product side, less so consulting. Internal projects also interesting. Organizing larger hackathon | | Leonie | 6-8 months commitment | Education + brand abroad | | Lukas G. | 5hrs [otherwise thesis commitment] | education (in particular linked to his thesis) | | Lukas R. | next 2 months [lead and almost full-time] after 2 months [uncertain 5-6 hrs] | Consulting, partnerships, | | Pascal | 4-5 hrs | Consulting, Education | | Patrick T. | 4-5 hrs per week [long term scaling back commitment] | supporting community work, support consulting guild | | Sergej L. | 3hrs per week | Admin support, advisory roles | | Victoria H. | 4-5hrs [scale back] | happy to lead if needed. - -consulting. + agency (if motivated team) | | Nick S. | 4-5hrs [scale back, a few months left] | Product/Implementation Guild |

1. Summary of Commitment
   1. Time investment of most members: 5hrs for a 2-3 month time horizon
   2. Topic focus: mixed, with members open to supporting in product, education, internal admin, growth
   3. Positioning: only a few members are willing to lead and drive products/projects forward.
2. Final discussion outcomes
   1. The DAO becomes a talent and network pool
   2. The DAO focuses on a project and rallies the members around
      1. In particular are there scenarios, situations, and projects we can work on
      2. What projects can all the members align behind?
   3. Suffering from a “chicken and egg” problem regarding the DAO, incorporation, and moving forward
   4. What incentives can the DAO provide to keep the members active and building for the DAO vs. members building on their own and moving on.
3. Outcomes and Next Steps
   1. Pause on incorporation and token distribution until the future becomes clearer
   2. Each member brainstorms and discusses with others potential projects and how to move forward (can we rally members behind a cause)
   3. A follow-up call to conclude the future of the DAO